
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>News &amp; Press</title>
<link>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/default.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[  Read about recent events, essential information, and the latest community news.  ]]></description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 7 May 2026 22:20:19 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Feb 2020 20:06:01 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2020 CPHR Manitoba</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news_rss.asp?cat=10929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Leave for Victims of Interpersonal Violence</title>
<link>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=488133</link>
<guid>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=488133</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<div class="ss-inline-share-wrapper ss-reveal-label ss-with-counter-border ss-inline-total-counter-left ss-left-inline-content ss-small-icons ss-with-spacing ss-rectangle-icons" style="color: #000000; margin: 0px 0px 25px;">
<div class="ss-inline-share-content">
<p style="color: #777777; margin: 0px 6px 6px 0px; padding: 0px; list-style-type: none; list-style-image: initial;"><span style="color: #333333;">On December 5, 2019, the Manitoba Legislative Assembly passed all stages of Bill No. 7,&nbsp;<em>The Employment Standards Code Amendment Act (Leave for Victims of Interpersonal Violence</em>), subsequently the “Act”. On the same date, the bill received Royal Assent and it is now in force.<br />
</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p style="color: #777777;"><span style="color: #333333;">The Act amends&nbsp;<em>The Employment Standards Code (Manitoba)</em>, or the “Code”, to broaden its current regime for domestic violence leave to include victims of sexual violence and stalking. The Act replaces the Code’s “Domestic Violence Leave” with “Interpersonal Violence Leave”.</span></p>
<p style="color: #777777;"><span style="color: #333333;">Three forms of violence are now covered under the Code’s interpersonal violence leave:</span></p>
<ul>
    <li style="color: #777777; margin: 0px 0px 15px 30px; padding: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333;">domestic violence;</span></li>
    <li style="color: #777777; margin: 0px 0px 15px 30px; padding: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333;">sexual violence; and</span></li>
    <li style="color: #777777; margin: 0px 0px 15px 30px; padding: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333;">stalking.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><a href="https://www.gov.mb.ca/labour/standards/doc,interpersonal_violence_leave,factsheet.html">Click here</a> fore more information.</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Feb 2020 21:06:01 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CPHR Manitoba&apos;s HR Legislative Review covers hot topics in HR, employment law updates</title>
<link>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=449509</link>
<guid>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=449509</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>CPHR Manitoba hosted its 2019 HR Legislative Review at the Viscount Gort Hotel on May 1, 2019. Over 140 attendees came to hear from representatives at MLT Aikins LLP, Taylor McCaffrey LLP and Thompson Dorfman Sweatman, who shared updates on legislation, employment law, immigration law and educated attendees on off-duty conduct, investigating workplace complaints, legal risks of HR professionals and working with external legal counsel.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><b><span>2019 Legislation Update - Devin Wehrle, MLT Aikins LLP<br />
</span></b><span>In this session, Wehrle covered three main topics: provincial changes for Manitoba, federal changes for everyone and federal changes that affect federally-regulated employers.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>In Manitoba, there were changes to The Employment Standards Code - particularly around leaves of absence, the employment of young people and standard hours of work - and the introduction of bills for The Workplace Safety and Health Amendment Act and The Labour Relations Amendment Act.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>In Canada, the legalization of marijuana and changes to employment insurance relating to parental leave were noted. Effective March 17, 2019, parents can now share up to an extra five weeks of parental leave if using the standard option and eight weeks can be shared if using the 18-month option.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>And if you're a federally-regulated employer, harassment prevention and changes to the Canada Labour Code are the biggest topics with a long list of noted changes in areas, including leaves of absence; holiday pay and continuous employment; breaks, rest periods and schedules; equal pay; and termination.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><b><span>Immigration Law 2019: Can Canadians Enter the U.S. to Make America Great Again... and some Canadian Stuff, too! - Reis Pagtakhan, MLT Aikins LLP<br />
</span></b><span>In this session, Pagtakhan painted a vivid picture about the changes to Canada and the U.S. when it comes to immigration laws. The U.S. has made things difficult for Canadians who wish to cross the border for work. U.S. President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order, "Buy American and Hire American", which set the tone for laws around hiring American citizens and protecting the economic interests of American businesses.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>Meanwhile, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) opened new doors for Canadian businesses and established free-trade agreements with other countries that wished to come to Canada for business visitors, professionals and technicians, intra-company transfers and investors. While Canada has expanded immigration options for Canadian businesses, it has also cracked down on businesses that have violated immigration programs.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><b><span>Employment Law Round Up - Bret Lercher, MLT Aikins LLP<br />
</span></b><span>In this session, Lercher discussed decisions made around the Human Rights Code (in Manitoba), case law from other jurisdictions that will impact non-union Manitoba employers&nbsp;and employment/labour cases.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>Lercher talked about different cases and their outcomes that have occurred over the past 15 months. In one specific case, an employee who went on maternity leave and received merit salary increase later than she would have if she did not go on leave. The Human Rights Commission reviewed the jurisdiction surrounding "the reasonable accommodation of employees on maternity leave and their ability to prove satisfactory performance in order to earn merit-based salary increase".&nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><b><span>Investigating Respectful Workplace Complaints - Shandra Czarnecki, MLT Aikins LLP<br />
</span></b><span>In this session, Czarnecki discussed statutory requirements around workplace policies and investigating allegations and incidents of respectful workplace issues.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>The "Achilles Heel" of a respectful workplace policy is often found in the complaint and investigation process. The fact that a policy of this nature isn't a "one size fits all" approach means that the policy needs to be tailored to fit within the specific workplace.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span><span style="color: #56565b;">Czarnecki also provided insights around warning signs to watch for when monitoring your workplace for harassment issues and ensuring that managers monitor for such unacceptable conduct as much as they monitor for unacceptable job performance. And&nbsp; if a complaint comes forward, ensure that it is taken seriously and that a proper, impartial review is conducted and a timely determination of the matter is reached.</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><b><span>Off-Duty Conduct - Jamie Jurczak, Taylor McCaffrey LLP<br />
</span></b><span>In this session, Jurczak sheds light on why we need to care about off-duty conduct.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>Employers have no jurisdiction or authority over employees outside working hours; however, where there is sufficient nexus between work and off-duty conduct, discipline may be warranted, possibly even dismissal.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>This includes the employee harming the company's reputation or product, the employee's behaviour renders the employee to be unable to perform their duties satisfactorily, or the employee's behaviour leads to the refusal, reluctance or inability of other employees to work with them.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>Employers need to look at the nature of their work environment, the off-duty conduct, the employee's duties and responsibilities, the impact of the employee's external interests and statutory rights.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><b><span>Obscure Legal Risks for HR Professionals: 'Quick Hits' on 3 Topics That May Not be on Your Radar&nbsp;- Silvia de Sousa, Colton Hnatiuk and Catherine Hamilton, Thompson Dorfman Sweatman<br />
</span></b><span> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>In this session, de Sousa, Hnatiuk and Hamilton took turns to discuss key areas that HR professions need to be mindful of from a legal standpoint.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>de Sousa talked about intellectual property clauses in employment agreements - including intellectual property like client lists, trade secrets, branding and marketing pieces - and protecting your company's assets. The myth is that the employer is automatically the owner of any intellectual property created by the employee or contractor; the reality is that the employer needs to implement procedures to ensure that the employer is the owner.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>Hnatiuk explored a third category of worker, apart from the typical Employee or Independent Contractor, called a Dependent Contractor. Hnatiuk outlined considerations that companies should be making when hiring a worker, and outlined the risks of a worker being deemed a Dependent Contractor. Dependent Contractors, as opposed to Independent Contractors, are entitled to reasonable notice upon termination, similar to an Employee, but are not entitled to other legislative entitlements as Employees may be. It is important to remember to clearly state the company’s intention in any agreement (Contractor or Employee) when hiring a worker. .</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>Hamilton then provided an in-depth discussion around privacy laws with a focus on securing employee personal information. HR professionals that collect, use, and disclose personal information about employees must ensure that they have appropriate security safeguards in place to protect employee personal information. Of critical importance is also developing a data breach response plan in the event that the security safeguards are breached.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span> </span><b><span>Working with External Legal Counsel - Ryan Savage, Taylor McCaffrey</span></b></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>In this session, Savage provided a list of tips and the steps in the litigation process when working with external legal counsel. Having legal counsel can reduce risks and create protection around various employment policies and contracts, including confidentiality, notice of termination and overtime. With legal counsel you can also seek guidance where appropriate to assess the legal risks and liabilities before taking action. But to use legal counsel effectively, you need to be transparent, organized and strategic in your approach to handling given situations.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt;"><span>CPHR Manitoba hosts the HR Legislative Review every Spring.</span></p>
<p> <span style="color: #56565b;">Thank you to our Presenting Sponsor,&nbsp;</span><span><a href="https://incoming.saveastamp.ca/linktracker2.aspx?%7b1~elizabetha@mediaedge.ca%7d%7ba93c69dd-d105-434e-91cb-f240c94aca69%7d%7b%7d%7bhttps%3a%2f%2fwww.mltaikins.com%2f%7d%7b%7d%7b%7d" target="_blank"><span style="color: #00a3e0;">MLT Aikins LLP,&nbsp;</span></a></span><span>&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #56565b;">and Supporter Sponsors,&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #333333;">&nbsp;</span><span><a href="https://incoming.saveastamp.ca/linktracker2.aspx?%7b1~elizabetha@mediaedge.ca%7d%7ba93c69dd-d105-434e-91cb-f240c94aca69%7d%7b%7d%7bhttps%3a%2f%2fwww.tmlawyers.com%2f%7d%7b%7d%7b%7d" target="_blank" title="https://Incoming.saveastamp.ca/linktracker2.aspx?%7b1~elizabetha@mediaedge.ca%7d%7ba93c69dd-d105-434e-91cb-f240c94aca69%7d%7b%7d%7bhttps%3a%2f%2fwww.tmlawyers.com%2f%7d%7b%7d%7b%7d"><span style="color: #00a3e0;">Taylor McCaffrey LLP, Thompson Dorfman Sweatman,&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #56565b;">&nbsp;</span></a></span><span style="color: #56565b;">and&nbsp;</span><span><a href="https://incoming.saveastamp.ca/linktracker2.aspx?%7b1~elizabetha@mediaedge.ca%7d%7ba93c69dd-d105-434e-91cb-f240c94aca69%7d%7b%7d%7bhttps%3a%2f%2fwww.habitat.mb.ca%2f%7d%7b%7d%7b%7d" target="_blank"><span style="color: #00a3e0;">&nbsp;Habitat For Humanity.</span></a></span><span> Your support made the 2019 HR Legislative Review a success!</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 14:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Manitoba Government passes law to offer victims of domestic violence leave from work</title>
<link>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=280124</link>
<guid>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=280124</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">On March 15, the Province of Manitoba passed the amendments to the Employment Standards Code regarding Domestic Violence Leave. The law will give victims five paid days (to be taken in one stretch or intermittently, when needed), five unpaid days and an additional 17-week unpaid period, if a victim needs to flee and find a new place to live.</span></div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><br>
</span></div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">To learn more about this first of its kind law, please <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/manitoba-approves-bill-to-offer-victims-of-domestic-violence-leave-from-work/article29255554/?click=sf_globefb">click here</a></span></div>
</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 22:47:55 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Call for Responses: Update to Employment Standards Code related to Domestic Violence Leave</title>
<link>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=272473</link>
<guid>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=272473</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">There is currently a proposed amendment to the Employment Standards Code before the legislature regarding domestic violence leave. This bill has passed second reading and will soon go to committee. We are looking for feedback from our members on this bill. Please provide your comments to&nbsp;<a href="mailto:hrmam@hrmam.org">hrmam@hrmam.org</a>&nbsp;with subject line: 'Domestic Violence Leave' by Friday, February 5, 2016.</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"></div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Key highlights of the proposed legislation include:</div>
</p>
<ul style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
    <li>Five (5) days paid leave plus a further ten (10) days unpaid leave totalling fifteen (15) days in any fifty-two (52) week period that can be taken intermittently for the purposes described including:
    <ul>
        <li>Making a police report</li>
        <li>Consulting legal counsel</li>
        <li>Consulting health care treatment/counselling</li>
        <li>Appearing in court</li>
        <li>Relcoating, etc</li>
    </ul>
    </li>
    <li>Additionally, there is a seventeen (17) week unpaid extended leave which must be taken all at one time.&nbsp;</li>
    <li>If employers have provisions in policy or Collective Agreements establishing paid sick leave or vacation leave in excess of the statutory minimum, these leaves may be used for the purpose of satisfying the employer’s obligation to provide five days paid leave.</li>
</ul>
<p>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">To read the full version, please <a href="http://web2.gov.mb.ca/bills/40-5/b012e.php">click here</a></div>
</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Submission to The Standing Committee on Justice Regarding Bill 50 </title>
<link>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=262056</link>
<guid>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=262056</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Originally Posted: June 12, 2014</span><br>
<br>
For a copy of the Legislative Review Committee's submission to the Standing Committee on Justice regarding Bill 50 - The Protection for Temporary Help Workers Act (Worker Recruitment and Protection Act and Employment Standards Code Amended),&nbsp;<a href="http://www.hrmam.org/resource/resmgr/Docs/HRMAM_Bill_50_Submission_Sig.pdf">click here.</a></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:46:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Legislation Requiring Defibrillators in Public Buildings Now in Effect</title>
<link>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=262057</link>
<guid>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=262057</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
</p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><span>Originally Posted: April 17, 2014</span></div>
<div style="text-align: right;"></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><span>Prepared by: Legislative Review Committee, HRMAM</span></div>
<br>
As of January 31, 2014, automated external defibrillators (or "AEDs" as they are commonly known) are required in designated public buildings in Manitoba pursuant to&nbsp;<i>The Defibrillator Public Access Act</i>&nbsp;(the "Act"). Manitoba is the first province in Canada to develop legislation requiring AEDs to be available on certain sites.<br>
<br>
While some of the premises designated under the Act are quite specific (such as the MTS Centre, the Manitoba Museum and the Winnipeg Convention Centre), there are some premises that may be designated based on the nature of the activities performed there, the number of people using the premises for a particular activity, or the number of hours the activity is performed at the premises (i.e., some fitness clubs and gyms). The legislation also sets out specific details with respect to location of the AED at a premises, signage, and registration with the Heart and Stroke Foundation.<br>
<br>
For the full text of the Act, please&nbsp;<a href="http://web2.gov.mb.ca/laws/statutes/ccsm/d022e.php">click here</a>. For further information on the Act and the list of designated public spaces, please click<a href="http://www.gov.mb.ca/health/aed/faq.html">&nbsp;here</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gov.mb.ca/health/aed/list.html">here</a>.<br>
<br>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 16:50:26 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Amendments to the Federal Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations </title>
<link>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=262059</link>
<guid>https://www.cphrmb.ca/news/news.asp?id=262059</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Originally Posted: January 30, 2014</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Prepared by: Legislative Review Committee, HRMAM</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>On December 31, 2013, amendments to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (SOR/2002-227) (the "Regulations") came into effect. These amendments:</p>
<ol>
    <li>Introduced new compliance tests and prerequisites that employers must meet before hiring temporary foreign workers; and </li>
    <li>Gave government officers expanded powers to verify compliance with the Regulations, including the power to conduct warrantless searches on employer premises.</li>
</ol>
<p>A full text of the amending regulations can be accessed here:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2014/2014-01-01/html/sor-dors245-eng.php">Regulations Amending the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2014/2014-01-01/html/sor-dors245-eng.php"><br>
</a></p>
<p>In June 2013, HRMAM sent a submission on these amendments to Citizenship and Immigration Canada. Summaries of HRMAM's June submission (which can be found&nbsp;<a href="http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1101670441266-703/Letter+to+Citizenship+and+Immigratrion+Canada+June+21+2013.pdf">here</a>) and the final draft of the amending regulations are provided in the chart below.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" style="width: 632px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-top-width: 1px; border-left-width: 1px;">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;"><span>HRMAM's June Submission<span class="Apple-tab-span"> </span></span></td>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;"><span>The Government of Canada's Final Amending Regulations</span></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;">HRMAM indicated its support for the requirement that employers should comply with federal and provincial laws. However, HRMAM called for clear rules to establish which violations of provincial and territorial laws could result in immigration enforcement action. HRMAM's concern was whether minor violations of the law would cause immigration enforcement.</td>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;">In the regulatory impact statement, the government acknowledged that employer groups requested clarification of certain terms and provisions including the triggers for government inspections. The government indicated that it is working to develop clear policies and guidance materials so that these changes will be well-understood by all stakeholders. However, none appeared in the final amending regulations. The government also indicated that during the LMO process, employers have the opportunity to submit new information that may affect the application.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;">HRMAM opposed the government's proposal that powers of investigation allow officers to conduct warrantless searches at the employer's premises. HRMAM's position was that warrants should be required for any intrusive search.</td>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;">The final amending regulations maintained the power to execute warrantless searches. However, the government clarified that its intent is that any search is only for the purpose of verifying compliance with the conditions imposed on the employer of a temporary foreign worker. The government also indicated that, in most cases, employers will be given 48 hours' notice of an inspection unless such notice would compromise the inspection.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;">HRMAM expressed concern that the government might interpret too strictly the requirement that employers of temporary foreign workers be "actively engaged" in the business in respect of which the offer of employment was made. Because of the diverse types of occupations being employed by various companies, HRMAM encourage the government not to adopt too strict a standard for "actively engaged".</td>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;">The government did not directly comment or make changes to their draft regulations.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;">HRMAM advocated that the government not change the "substantially the same" provisions, which allowed employers to vary the terms and conditions of employment or wages provided to temporary foreign workers provided that they remained "substantially the same" as what was originally represented in the immigration process. The government's proposal was that wages, working conditions and employment must remain "substantially the same" but could not result in wages, working conditions and employment that were "less favourable".</td>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;">The government did not directly comment or make changes to their draft regulations.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;">HRMAM took the position that it was not necessary to require employers to make reasonable efforts to provide a workplace that is free of abuse, as there are provincial laws that cover these types of cases.</td>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;">The government did not directly comment or make changes to their draft regulations.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;">HRMAM took the position that amendments requiring that employers of temporary foreign workers prove job creation or retention, the transfer of skills and knowledge to Canadian permanent residents, and the hiring or training of Canadian citizens not be an absolute requirement, but that employers can be found to be compliant with these conditions as long as they make "reasonable efforts" to live up to these types of commitments.</td>
            <td style="padding: 0px; border-style: solid; border-color: black; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; text-align: left;">The government did not directly comment or make changes to their draft regulations.</td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In addition to introducing changes to the Regulations, Citizenship and Immigration Canada also introduced Ministerial Instructions impacting the hiring of temporary foreign workers. These Ministerial Instructions set out the following:</p>
<ol>
    <li>When work permit processing can be suspended;</li>
    <li>When an issued work permit can be revoked;</li>
    <li>When labour market opinions can be revoked or suspended; or </li>
    <li>When Service Canada can refuse to process an LMO application.</li>
</ol>
<p>The full text of these Ministerial Instructions can be found here:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2013/2013-12-28/html/notice-avis-eng.html#d108">Ministerial Instructions Respecting Labour Market Opinions&nbsp;</a>and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2013/2013-12-28/html/notice-avis-eng.html#d102">Ministerial Instructions Respecting the Revocation of Work Permits.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:52:14 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
